<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Schema Czar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.schemaczar.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.schemaczar.com</link>
	<description>Experienced thinking on designing, building, supporting, and maintaining software - database software and otherwise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Three bars of gold</title>
		<link>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-11/three-bars-of-gold/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-11/three-bars-of-gold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Schema Czar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Database Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infosec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schemaczar.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CIA triangle – confidentiality, integrity, availability - are the three well-known criteria for judging security of information systems. They are the "triangle" of your security.  It is fairly easy for someone to judge whether an information system has these qualities of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. I would like to point out that there are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-11/three-bars-of-gold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Measuring Security as Cost to Breach</title>
		<link>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-10/measuring-security-as-cost-to-breach/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-10/measuring-security-as-cost-to-breach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Schema Czar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schemaczar.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once we have deconstructed our thoughts of security in terms of absolutes, how do we understand the jobs we face or know when we're done?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-10/measuring-security-as-cost-to-breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great list! 10 Papers Every Programmer Should Read (At Least Twice)</title>
		<link>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/great-list-10-papers-every-programmer-should-read-at-least-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/great-list-10-papers-every-programmer-should-read-at-least-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Schema Czar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schemaczar.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually I dislike tiny reposts of someone else's blog, but this is a great list... 10 Papers Every Programmer Should Read (At Least Twice) What's worse is that this post is two years old, and I pulled it from Ward Cunningham's twitter.  But when I saw the list, I had to share it.  In fact, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/great-list-10-papers-every-programmer-should-read-at-least-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Password mismanagement</title>
		<link>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/password-mismanagement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/password-mismanagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Database Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking Relationally]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schemaczar.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you send a password to someone through email, it never dies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/password-mismanagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whose Proc is it anyway?</title>
		<link>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/whose-proc-is-it-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/whose-proc-is-it-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Schema Czar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Database Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schemaczar.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some very nasty things can happen to a perfectly charming, unassuming PL/SQL package between the time you write it and the time it goes 'live.']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schemaczar.com/2011-08/whose-proc-is-it-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

